Age-related bone loss. A hypothesis and initial assessment in mice

Citation:

Kahn A, Gibbons R, Perkins S, Gazit D. Age-related bone loss. A hypothesis and initial assessment in mice [Internet]. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1995;(313):69-75. Copy at http://www.tinyurl.com/y3nv5nb9

Abstract:

The osteopenia associated with advanced age appears to be a universal phenomenon in humans and animals, but the mechanisms by which it occurs are understood incompletely. However, the explanation must lie in an absolute or relative diminution in the level of osteoblastic bone-forming activity when compared with osteoclastic bone-resorbing activity. The authors postulated that with old age there would be a reduction in the number or function or both of osteoblastic stem cells that could account for part of the diminution in bone formation. They further postulated that there would be either no change or an increase in osteoclastic potential and bone resorption. To test these concepts, bone marrow cells were isolated from 4- to 6-month-old or 24-month-old mice and cultured in vitro under a variety of circumstances that permitted an assessment of the stromal osteogenic cells and marrow hemopoietic progenitor cells belonging to the monocyte and osteoclast series. These data show a marked reduction in the number and in vitro activity of stromal osteogenic cells from old animals. There is an increase in old mice in the number of marrow cells capable of forming osteoclasts in coculture and responsive to the growth factors believed operational in the monocyte and osteoclast series. The authors now are exploring the hypothesis that an age-related diminution in transforming growth factor-beta levels is responsible for these changes in progenitor cell levels in marrow and their functional status as expressed in vitro.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Notes:

Kahn, A Gibbons, R Perkins, S Gazit, D eng R01-AR41328/AR/NIAMS NIH HHS/ R0I-33716/PHS HHS/ Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S. 1995/04/01 Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995 Apr;(313):69-75.

Website